Building Evidence That Gets Services Approved: Photograph, Video, Write It Down

Advocacy ResourcesDocumentation StrategiesHow-To GuidesMichigan-Specific

Building evidence that gets services approved: photograph, video, write it down

Five kinds of evidence decide most waiver and service disputes, and four of them you have to create yourself. Nobody at your Community Mental Health agency is going to build this record for you.

By Jim Palasty · 11 min read · Documentation

Step 1
Document the baseline
Consistent medical treatment records and a physician letter naming specific functional limitations in activities of daily living.

Step 2
Document the absence
What happens without the service. Regression, hospitalizations, crisis calls, missed work, injuries. Dated, specific, repeated.

Step 3
Document the refusal
Every denial in writing, every unfilled authorized hour, every verbal no converted into an email. Then the deadlines start running.

Start here
Ask your adult child’s physician for a functional limitations letter, in writing, this month

Not a letter saying your adult child has autism. Every reviewer already knows the diagnosis. Ask for a letter that names specific limitations in specific activities of daily living, describes the level of assistance required for each, and states what deteriorates without support. Bring the doctor a list of the activities before the appointment so the letter can be written in one visit. A diagnosis letter proves eligibility. A functional limitations letter proves need, and need is what gets hours approved.

Medical records

Consistent, ongoing treatment documentation. Gaps in treatment get read as gaps in need, fairly or not.

Featured

Physician letter

The single most useful document you can obtain. It must describe function, not diagnosis, and it must be specific enough that a stranger could picture the day.

Featured

Absence evidence

What happens when the service is not there. Regression, ER visits, police contacts, injuries, missed work. This is the category families almost never document and reviewers weigh most heavily.

Third-party statements

Teachers, providers, direct support professionals, neighbors, employers. People who observed the same thing you did and are not related to you.

Featured

10

The 10-day rule

In Michigan, to keep services running during an appeal you must request continuation within 10 calendar days of the adverse benefit determination notice, or by its effective date, whichever is later.

Everything in writing

A verbal denial cannot be appealed because it does not exist. Ask for every denial as a written notice. That request alone changes some answers.

Michigan appeal deadlines, in order

File a local appeal
Within 60 calendar days of the notice
Keep services running
Request within 10 calendar days
PIHP resolves standard appeal
Within 30 calendar days
PIHP resolves expedited appeal
Within 72 hours
Request a State Fair Hearing
Within 120 days of the resolution notice
Keep services during the hearing
Request within 10 days of the denial letter
Recipient Rights complaint
No deadline, file any time
Form to use
MDHHS-5617 request for hearing

Eleven photographs and a calendar

Angela photographed her son’s bedroom door for eleven months. Same angle, same time of day, after each episode. When the reduction notice came, she brought the photographs and a calendar with every crisis marked. The reviewer had a form describing a young man who was “generally stable.” Angela had eleven months of evidence that generally stable was a description of the paperwork, not of her son.

Show them the year. Not the sentence.

Your move

Build a record a reviewer cannot wave off

Do these in order

  1. 1Request the written notice for every denial.
  2. 2Get a physician functional limitations letter.
  3. 3Start dated logs of incidents and unfilled hours.
  4. 4Collect third-party statements while events are fresh.
  5. 5File the local appeal within 60 days.
  6. 6Request benefit continuation within 10 days.

What counts as evidence

  • Dated photographs of property damage or injury
  • Video of a support task, with consent, showing assistance level
  • A daily log of behaviors, sleep, and crisis events
  • ER discharge papers and police contact records
  • Written statements from providers and teachers
  • Emails confirming what staff said verbally
  • Every denial notice, kept forever
  • Missed shift logs showing authorized hours undelivered

You are not building a case for a courtroom. You are building a file that makes saying no more work than saying yes.

The full story · For readers who want context

A reviewer who has never met your adult child will spend somewhere between eight and twenty minutes deciding how many hours of support they need. That is not cynicism, it is caseload arithmetic. Everything in this post is about what you can put in front of that person so that twenty minutes lands on the right side.

The five categories, and why four of them are yours

Service decisions get made on a record. The record has five parts, and you are responsible for building four of them.

One, consistent medical treatment records. This one mostly builds itself, as long as your adult child is actually being seen. Gaps matter. A two-year gap in treatment reads to a reviewer as two years of not needing anything, whether or not that is what happened.

Two, a physician letter on functional limitations. This is the highest-leverage document in the entire process and most families never request one. More on it below.

Three, documentation of what happens without the service. The absence evidence. This is the category that decides close cases and the category almost nobody keeps.

Four, third-party statements. People who are not you, saying what they saw.

Five, every denial in writing. Not because denials are useful on their own, but because a written denial starts a clock, and a clock is the only thing that makes a system move.

The physician letter, and how to actually get a good one

Here is the mistake I made for years. I asked doctors for letters and got back a paragraph confirming a diagnosis, which every reviewer in the process already had in front of them.

Diagnosis establishes eligibility. Function establishes need. Hours are approved on need.

So ask for something specific. A letter that names activities of daily living by name, describes the level of assistance required for each, and states what deteriorates without support. Bathing, toileting, dressing, eating, mobility, medication management, safety awareness, communication. For each one, is the person independent, does it require cueing, does it require hands-on assistance, does it require two people.

Make it easy on the physician. Bring a typed list of the activities to the appointment with your own notes on each, and ask the doctor to review, correct, and put it on letterhead. Most physicians will do this in one visit if you hand them the structure. Very few will build the structure themselves in a fifteen-minute slot.

The sentence that makes a letter work. “Without [specific service] at [specific frequency], this patient is at risk of [specific documented outcome], as evidenced by [specific past event with a date].” A reviewer can approve hours off that sentence. A reviewer cannot approve hours off “would benefit from continued support.”

Absence evidence, which is the one that wins

Every family can describe a bad day. Almost no family can prove a bad year.

Absence evidence is documentation of what happens when the support is not there. Regression in skills. Emergency department visits. Police contacts. Property damage. Injuries, to your adult child or to you. Missed work and lost income. Sleep collapse. Elopement.

Photograph it, with the date visible or embedded in the file metadata. Video a support task, with your adult child’s consent where consent is possible, showing what assistance actually looks like. Keep a plain daily log with three lines a day. Keep the discharge paperwork from every emergency visit.

This feels awful. I want to be honest about that. Photographing your own child’s worst moments in order to prove to a stranger that your family qualifies for help is a degrading thing to have to do, and the fact that it works does not make it less degrading. It is also the difference between a denial and an approval often enough that I am not going to pretend otherwise.

One log entry proves nothing. Eleven months of log entries with the same pattern proves a pattern, and a pattern is what a reviewer needs to write a different number on a form.

The deadlines, because evidence is useless late

In Michigan, service decisions in the public behavioral health system come with an Adverse Benefit Determination notice, and that notice starts several clocks at once.

You have 60 calendar days from the date of the notice to file a local appeal with your Prepaid Inpatient Health Plan. The PIHP then has 30 calendar days to resolve a standard appeal, or 72 hours for an expedited one where waiting would seriously jeopardize health or function.

If the appeal is resolved against you, you have up to 120 calendar days from the date of that resolution notice to request a State Fair Hearing before an administrative law judge, using form MDHHS-5617.

And here is the deadline that costs families the most, because it is the shortest and the least advertised. If services are being reduced, suspended, or terminated and you want them to keep running during the appeal, you must request continuation within 10 calendar days of the notice, or by the intended effective date, whichever is later. Ten days. To keep the hours your adult child already has while you argue about them.

The Waskul settlement, effective for Michigan self-determination arrangements and running through 2029, strengthened the review available in these disputes and tightened the requirement that Community Living Supports budgets actually be costed out to meet documented need. Which means the documentation you build has more to push against than it did five years ago.

Your practical next steps

This week. Start the three-line daily log. Date, what happened, what support was or was not there. That is it. You will not keep a complicated system and you do not need one.

This month. Book the physician appointment and bring the typed activities-of-daily-living list. Ask for the letter on letterhead, signed and dated, and ask for two originals.

The day any notice arrives. Read the date on it, count 10 days forward, and write that date on your calendar in something you will see. Then count 60 days forward and write that one down too. Everything else in the appeal can be figured out. Those two dates cannot be recovered once they pass.

The system is not designed to be navigated by exhausted people, and you are exhausted. But the documentation asymmetry runs in your favor for once. They have a form and twenty minutes. You have the whole story, dated. Use it.