Creating a Housing Emergency Plan Before Caregivers Age

Advocacy ResourcesDocumentation StrategiesHow-To Guides

Creating a Housing Emergency Plan Before Caregivers Age

Plan A is the long-term placement. Plan B is the bridge if Plan A fails. Plan C is the crisis door when both fail. Build all three on the same evening, in writing, before any of them is needed. The night Plan A fails is not the night to start drafting Plan B.

By Jim Palasty · OASIS for Autism · 10 min read

3

Plans, written tonight

Plan A: long-term placement. Plan B: bridge. Plan C: crisis door. The drafting time is one evening. The peace of mind is the rest of the years.

Step 01 · Plan A
Long-term placement

The waiver-funded residential setting the family is working toward. May not be available yet. Apply, document, build the routine.

Step 02 · Plan B
Bridge placement

Short-term respite or temporary placement that holds for thirty to ninety days while Plan A is finalized or repaired.

Step 03 · Plan C
Crisis door

Emergency placement, crisis stabilization, or hospital-to-home program. Used when both prior plans fail simultaneously.

Start Here

Draft all three plans on one evening, on one page each.

Plan A: target setting, target start date, application status, what triggers activation. Plan B: bridge provider name, contact, what triggers activation, expected duration. Plan C: crisis contact, hospital, after-hours number, what triggers activation. Three pages. Sign and date. Share with the case manager and the named successors. The drafting is the hard part. The doing is whatever follows the trigger.

Featured

The night Plan A fails

Most families discover the need for Plan B at three in the morning, after a hospitalization, eviction notice, or staff walkout. The night Plan A fails is the worst possible night to start drafting Plan B.

Plan A: long-term

Waiver-funded residential placement matching the adult’s support needs and preferences. May be group home, supported living, shared living, or intentional community. Built from the housing model comparison.

Plan B: bridge

Short-term respite, emergency respite, or transitional placement that holds the adult for thirty to ninety days. State waivers fund respite. Some provider agencies operate dedicated bridge units.

24 Hrs

Plan C: crisis door

Crisis stabilization unit, hospital-to-home program, or 988-connected crisis response. The window from call to placement is hours, not days. The contact info has to be in hand before the call.

Triggers, written

Each plan has a written trigger. Plan A triggers on waiver slot offer. Plan B triggers on Plan A interruption or caregiver hospitalization. Plan C triggers on imminent risk to safety.

The case manager knows

Share all three plans with the case manager in writing. The plans are the operational map the case manager works from when the family calls at three in the morning.

What each plan answers in writing
Plan A: target
Specific setting and provider, application status, expected start
Plan A: triggers
Slot offer, sibling availability, caregiver retirement
Plan B: provider
Specific respite or bridge provider, named contact, intake protocol
Plan B: triggers
Plan A interruption, caregiver hospitalization, staff walkout
Plan C: crisis
Crisis stabilization unit, ER protocol, 988 contact, after-hours number
Plan C: triggers
Imminent risk to safety, behavioral crisis exceeding home capacity
All plans
Letter of intent attached, current med list, signed releases
What it looks like

My husband fell at five in the morning and broke his hip. By seven I had called Plan B. By noon our son was at the respite unit with his bag of routines and the laminated letter of intent we had updated in March. He stayed there nineteen days while my husband had surgery and started rehab. The respite unit had three days of staff turnover during that stretch. The laminated letter held the rest together. We had built Plan B four years earlier and only ever practiced it on paper. The morning of the fall it ran like a fire drill we had rehearsed since the kids were small.

Beth, Jackson

Your Move

Drafting and maintaining the three plans

  1. One evening this week. Three pages, one per plan. Specific names, numbers, addresses.
  2. Share the three plans with the case manager, the named successor caregivers, and any provider in the picture.
  3. Practice Plan B once on paper. Walk through the steps without activating. Identify the gaps.
  4. Update the plans annually, on the same date as the letter of intent review.
  5. Re-verify Plan B and Plan C contacts every six months. People move. Numbers change. Verify.
  • Plan A drafted, signed, shared
  • Plan B drafted, signed, shared
  • Plan C drafted, signed, shared
  • Plan B contact verified within last six months
  • Plan C contact verified within last six months
  • Letter of intent attached to each plan
  • Annual review date on calendar

Plan A is the future. Plan B is the bridge. Plan C is the door. Build all three before any of them is needed.


The full story · For readers who want context

Beth’s husband fell at five in the morning on a Wednesday in March. He broke his hip on the kitchen tile. The ambulance was there in twelve minutes. The ER triaged him at six fifteen. By seven, Beth had called her son’s respite provider, the one she had been keeping current on her contact list for four years even though they had never used it. The respite unit had a bed by ten. Their son walked through the door at noon with his backpack of routines, his medications labeled and dated, and the laminated letter of intent that the family had last updated three months earlier. He stayed nineteen days. The respite unit cycled through three different overnight aides during that stretch because of unrelated staffing problems. The laminated letter held the rest of the routine together. Beth had built Plan B four years earlier when the family had drafted Plan A and never been needed to use it. The morning of the fall it ran like a fire drill the family had rehearsed since their kids were small. That is the difference between drafted and rehearsed, and drafted and current, and drafted and forgotten in a folder somewhere. The three plans only work when they exist on paper, in hand, and recent.

Why three plans, why now.

Here is what they will not tell you on the front of any waiver brochure. A residential plan for an autistic adult is not one decision. It is a sequence of decisions with branch points, each of which can fail, and each failure point has a different remedy. Plan A is the long-term placement the family is working toward, the waiver-funded residential setting that fits the adult’s needs and preferences. Plan A is what families spend years preparing. Plan B is the bridge: a short-term respite or temporary placement that holds for thirty to ninety days while Plan A is finalized, repaired, or sequenced. Plan C is the crisis door: an emergency placement, crisis stabilization, or hospital-to-home program for when both prior plans fail simultaneously.

The reason all three exist in writing, drafted before any is needed, is that the alternative is improvisation under conditions that produce worse outcomes than the worst pre-drafted plan. A family at three in the morning, with an aging caregiver in the hospital, who has not identified a respite provider, will end up calling the ER, which will admit the autistic adult or hold them in a hallway until a placement opens. The same family, with Plan B in a folder, makes one call to a known provider and the adult is in a familiar bed within six hours. The plans are not optional; they are the difference between a controlled handoff and a chaotic one.

Plan A: the long-term placement.

Plan A is built from the housing models analysis. Group home, supported living, shared living, or intentional community. Specific provider, specific bed, specific funding source. The waiver application is open. The waiting list is current. The family has toured. The trial weekend, if any, has happened. The provider has indicated acceptance pending slot availability. The case manager has the file. The Letter of Intent has been shared with the provider.

Plan A may not be available today. Plan A may not be available for years. That is fine; Plan A’s status is what it is. What matters is that the plan is written, the variables are current, and the activation conditions are documented. When the slot opens, the activation script is one page of “here is who to call, in what order, with what documents in hand.” The slot phone call is not the time to be rebuilding the placement plan from scratch.

Plan B: the bridge.

Plan B is what holds the system together when Plan A is interrupted or delayed. The bridge can be respite (state-funded short-term residential, often paid through the waiver’s respite line), emergency respite (a subset of respite specifically designed for unplanned activation), or transitional placement (a longer-term arrangement that holds the adult while Plan A is repaired or sequenced).

Identify the Plan B provider years before you need one. Tour. Ask about emergency availability. Document the intake protocol. Keep the contact information current. Most respite providers have intake forms that can be pre-completed and held on file, so that activation at three in the morning takes one phone call rather than two hours of paperwork. Ask whether your chosen Plan B provider does this. If not, find one that does.

Plan B’s triggers are written. The most common triggers: caregiver hospitalization, caregiver death, residential provider staff walkout, behavioral incident exceeding home capacity, eviction notice, housing damage (fire, flood), caregiver retirement on a previously planned date. Each trigger should appear in the written Plan B with the activation script.

Plan C: the crisis door.

Plan C is the floor. When Plan A is unavailable and Plan B is also unreachable (the respite unit is full, the provider has changed hands, the bridge is gone), Plan C activates. Plan C contacts include the state crisis stabilization unit, the regional Community Mental Health crisis team, the hospital-to-home program if one operates in the region, and the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline (which, since 2022, includes mobile crisis dispatch in many areas including for behavioral health crises in people with developmental disabilities).

The Plan C contacts need to be in hand, on paper, before they are needed. The 988 system can dispatch mobile crisis response in many regions, but the dispatch effectiveness varies widely. Some regions have well-trained crisis response teams that include developmental disabilities specialists; some regions do not. Know which type your region has. If the local crisis team is not well-suited to autism crises, identify the alternative: the regional CMH, the children’s hospital ER (which often has better neurodevelopmental capacity than general ERs), the private respite unit that takes walk-ins.

Plan C’s triggers are the most severe: imminent risk to safety (the adult’s or others’), behavioral crisis exceeding home capacity, hospitalization of the autistic adult themselves, sudden loss of housing with no other placement available. Activation of Plan C is rare in a well-built three-plan structure, which is the point.

Triggers, written explicitly.

The single most important feature of the three-plan structure is written, explicit triggers. Each plan has an activation condition. The activation conditions are clear enough that a sibling, a successor caregiver, or a case manager can apply them without needing to call the parent for interpretation.

Trigger examples. “Plan A activates when waiver slot is offered.” “Plan B activates if Plan A start is delayed more than 60 days past the offered date, OR if caregiver hospitalization exceeds 24 hours, OR if Plan A provider gives notice of imminent placement change.” “Plan C activates if Plan B respite unit is full or unreachable, OR if hospital ER is the only available bed, OR if imminent safety risk exceeds home capacity in the same hour.”

Triggers prevent paralysis. The morning Beth’s husband fell, Beth did not have to debate whether to call Plan B. The trigger was hit. The activation script was clear. The phone call was the next thing. Three hours of indecision is what bad outcomes are made of.

What goes into each plan, in writing.

Each plan should be one page, signed by the parent (or guardian or successor as applicable), and dated with the most recent review. The contents per plan: target setting (specific provider name, address, contact), funding source, application status (Plan A only), activation triggers in plain language, activation script (who to call, in what order, with what documents), expected duration, exit criteria back to Plan A.

Attach the current Letter of Intent (or a one-page summary), current medication list with allergies, signed HIPAA releases for relevant providers, the BSP if one exists, and the case manager’s contact information. Keep the attachments current. Stale attachments are sometimes worse than no attachments because they create the illusion of being prepared without actually being prepared.

Practice on paper, not just in the head.

Once the three plans are drafted, walk through Plan B and Plan C on paper as if they were activating. Read the trigger out loud. Read the first call. Identify what would happen next. Where does the gap show up? The trial run usually reveals two or three gaps the family had not noticed: a phone number that turns out to be a wrong number when dialed, an intake form the provider needs that the family has not pre-completed, a HIPAA release that has not been updated since the adult’s eighteenth birthday. Fix the gaps. Re-run the trial.

Do not actually activate the plans for practice. Activation has real costs: bed-night charges, intake processing, staff time. Paper practice is sufficient. Even paper practice is more practice than most families have ever done.

Documenting urgency for systems.

Some plan activations require documentation to systems beyond the immediate provider. Medicaid agencies may need to reauthorize service hours. The state waiver office may need to be notified of placement changes. The HCBS waiver case manager will need to update the person-centered plan. Document these system-side notifications as part of the activation script for each plan. The system catch-up is the part that gets dropped during a crisis and then generates an overpayment notice three months later.

For Plan C specifically, the documentation of urgency to the state waiver office is important. A documented crisis activation often moves the family from a “future need” category to an “urgent” or “in-crisis” category on any pending waiver waitlist. This is the moment when the risk-log work from the waitlist post pays off.

What other states make easier.

Several states fund dedicated emergency respite networks specifically for adults with developmental disabilities (Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin). Several states publish crisis stabilization protocols and mobile crisis team contacts publicly (Massachusetts, Oregon, Vermont). The 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, federally funded, includes mobile crisis dispatch in a growing number of regions with developmental disabilities trained responders. Michigan funds Community Mental Health regional crisis teams of varying quality, with mobile crisis dispatch available in most regions through the PIHP system but with less consistent autism-specific response capacity than some peer states. Other states made different choices about crisis infrastructure. Michigan didn’t, fully.

Your assignment this week.

One evening. Three pages. Plan A, Plan B, Plan C. Specific names, numbers, addresses. Sign and date. Share with the case manager and the named successor caregivers. Set the annual review on the calendar with the Letter of Intent update. Re-verify Plan B and Plan C contacts every six months. The night Plan A fails is not the night to start drafting Plan B. Other states have built more of the infrastructure that backs up Plan B and Plan C. Michigan didn’t, fully. Now we know what we are fighting. Together.